Where they stand on data centers
On concerns about hyperscale data centers
The concern I hear most is simple: South Dakotans feel the deal is done before they ever get a say. My friends and neighbors across the state aren't anti-tech or anti-development, but they're tired of learning about billion-dollar projects after the agreements are signed. And they bring practical questions. How much water and electricity will these facilities pull, and will my utility bill go up to cover it? Why are we offering tax incentives to out-of-state corporations if we can't give South Dakotans a break on grocery sales tax? What happens to clean water, to neighborhoods, to the farmland and commercial property displaced by hyperscale data centers? Are hyperscale data centers really the best use of our economic development resources? South Dakotans want transparency, local control, and the right to be heard. Right now, too many feel they're getting less information than the developers sitting across the table for projects requiring huge resources with little opportunity.
How they’d address those concerns
No blank checks, and no secrecy. I co-sponsored a one-year moratorium on hyperscale data centers because South Dakota doesn't have an appropriate regulatory framework yet. Until we do, we shouldn't be signing deals we can't undo. An appropriate regulatory process values local and constituent voices and sets a clear, high bar for a project to move forward. The company pays for the water, power, and transmission it uses, not the family watching their utility bill climb. The community gets real input and the authority to say yes or no, not a ribbon-cutting they read about after the fact. We see the financing, the tax deals, and the real jobs and revenue numbers, and we verify them. And there's money set aside up front to clean up the site and take care of workers if the project leaves. I'll also ensure definitions are clear, because the lack of a definition for "hyperscale" is exactly what sank the bill to end data center NDAs. The smaller centers we already have, including a well-publicized success story in Sully County, have been useful. Hyperscale is a different animal, and it deserves more scrutiny at every step. My constituents have made it clear to me: hyperscale data centers should not come at the cost of their water, their neighborhoods, their tax dollars, or their voice.
Voting record
On 2026-session data center bills · House record
allow the Public Utilities Commission to assess actual costs to data centers that are customers of public utilities.
prohibit nondisclosure of certain agreements related to data centers.
protect residents from increased utility costs and utility shortages caused by data centers and clarify authority to regulate data centers.
limit costs and risks associated with electricity use by data centers and impose a moratorium.
Campaign money
Money is a signal, never a position. A flag below means a donor matched a category. It is not a finding that anything improper happened.
Muckey For South Dakota
Flagged contributions to their own committee
- Utility, power and energy interests$500
Flagged donors, largest first
- SD Ethanol Producers Pac $500 [B]
These named donors add up to $500, against the $500 flagged above. The itemisation on file is partial, so the list is not the whole of it. That gap is a limit of what has been collected, not a finding.
Every itemised contribution on file (57)›
| (UNITEMIZED - gifts of $100 or less; no donor names required by SDCL 12-27-24(11)) | $3,557 |
| Wade McIntyre | $1,100 |
| Erin Muckey | $1,000 |
| Scott Muckey | $1,000 |
| Dale Swier | $1,000 |
| Bill Sands | $1,000 |
| Erik Muckey | $600 |
| Greater Sioux Falls Chamber of Commerce BIZPAC | $500 |
| South Dakota Trial Lawyers Political Action Committee | $500 |
| SD Ethanol Producers Pacutility & energy | $500 |
| Caitlin Hof | $500 |
| Jeff Sundet | $500 |
| Norman Bliss | $500 |
| Thad Titze | $500 |
| Tony Nour | $500 |
| Tyler Neuroth | $500 |
| Steve Watkins | $500 |
| Erik Muckey | $399 |
| Craig Matson LLC | $350 |
| SD Chiropractic Pac | $350 |
| Brule County Democrats | $317 |
| Minnehaha County Democratic Party | $291 |
| Pam Swier | $270 |
| South Dakota Public Power PAC | $250 |
| South Dakota Insurance Alliance PAC | $250 |
| Anne Rieck McFarland | $250 |
| Cheryl Rehfeldt | $250 |
| Clay Hoffman | $250 |
| James Walker | $250 |
| Steve Erpenbach | $250 |
| Tom Parker | $250 |
| Barbara Johnson | $250 |
| Blaine Reynolds | $250 |
| Ericka Waterman | $250 |
| Jamie Rexwinkel | $250 |
| Janet Hovey Johnson | $250 |
| Joe Kirby | $250 |
| Karen Wattier | $250 |
| Rod McGinnis | $250 |
| Wittman for House | $228 |
| Ardon Wek | $200 |
| Kade Rexwinkel | $200 |
| Soren Stevenson | $200 |
| Steve Watkins | $200 |
| Jamie McDowell | $200 |
| Michael Simon | $200 |
| Rachelle Norberg | $200 |
| (UNITEMIZED - gifts of $100 or less; no donor names required by SDCL 12-27-24(11)) | $186 |
| Wendy Mamer | $150 |
| Brown County Democratic Central Committee | $150 |
| Janine Harris | $150 |
| Kelly Henkel Thompson | $150 |
| Erik Muckey | $100 |
| Turner County Democrat Party | $100 |
| South Dakota Petroleum and Propane Marketers PAC | $100 |
| Andrew Larcher for District 15 Senate | $57 |
| Sadie Swier | $50 |
Collected via SOS portal pull, Aug 2026. Contributor names appear exactly as the committee filed them. Donor addresses are not published.
Other candidates in this race
State Senate · District 15


