General election · 3 November 2026

State Senate, District 15

2 candidates on the ballot, listed in certified ballot order.

Race type
Contested
Candidates
2
Surveys returned
1 of 2
Race receipts
$26,560

Brenda Lawrence

Not a sitting legislator

RepublicanBallot order 1

Where they stand on data centers

Nothing on record.Brenda has never held legislative office, so there are no roll calls to score.

Survey: no response recorded

With no voting record and no returned questionnaire, this page has nothing from them on data centers. Voters have no stated position to weigh.

Ask them to answer

Money — a signal, never a position

$3,495Total receipts reported
$250Matched a flag (A–D)
  • CThe PAC funnel$250

Flagged donors on recordDusty PAC $250 [C]

Committee: Brenda Sue Lawrence.

A flag means a donor matched a category. It is not a finding that anything improper happened.

How to reach them

Share this card

Erik Muckey

Erik Muckey

Sitting legislator

DemocratBallot order 2

Where they stand on data centers

75%protective votes — 3 of 4 tracked roll calls

Stood with residents

Survey: responded

The concern I hear most is simple: South Dakotans feel the deal is done before they ever get a say. My friends and neighbors across the state aren't anti-tech or anti-development, but they're tired of learning about billion-dollar projects after the agreements are signed. And they bring practical questions. How much water and electricity will these facilities pull, and will my utility bill go up to cover it? Why are we offering tax incentives to out-of-state corporations if we can't give South Dakotans a break on grocery sales tax? What happens to clean water, to neighborhoods, to the farmland and commercial property displaced by hyperscale data centers? Are hyperscale data centers really the best use of our economic development resources? South Dakotans want transparency, local control, and the right to be heard. Right now, too many feel they're getting less information than the developers sitting across the table for projects requiring huge resources with little opportunity.
No blank checks, and no secrecy. I co-sponsored a one-year moratorium on hyperscale data centers because South Dakota doesn't have an appropriate regulatory framework yet. Until we do, we shouldn't be signing deals we can't undo. An appropriate regulatory process values local and constituent voices and sets a clear, high bar for a project to move forward. The company pays for the water, power, and transmission it uses, not the family watching their utility bill climb. The community gets real input and the authority to say yes or no, not a ribbon-cutting they read about after the fact. We see the financing, the tax deals, and the real jobs and revenue numbers, and we verify them. And there's money set aside up front to clean up the site and take care of workers if the project leaves. I'll also ensure definitions are clear, because the lack of a definition for "hyperscale" is exactly what sank the bill to end data center NDAs. The smaller centers we already have, including a well-publicized success story in Sully County, have been useful. Hyperscale is a different animal, and it deserves more scrutiny at every step. My constituents have made it clear to me: hyperscale data centers should not come at the cost of their water, their neighborhoods, their tax dollars, or their voice.
Published verbatim as submitted

Money — a signal, never a position

$23,065Total receipts reported
$500Matched a flag (A–D)
  • BUtility, power and energy interests$500

Flagged donors on recordSD Ethanol Producers Pac $500 [B]

Committee: Muckey For South Dakota.

Receipts were collected by hand from the filed forms, so this lists only the donors that matched a flag, not the full itemized list. A flag means a donor matched a category. It is not a finding that anything improper happened.

How to reach them

Share this card

What the flags mean

A · Data center and Big Tech
The industry itself, its lobbyists, and the trade group that testified for the 50-year tax break.
B · Utility, power and energy
Utilities, generators, transmission and the ethanol bloc — interests whose revenue rises with data center load.
C · The PAC funnel
Money arriving through a political action committee rather than directly.
D · Named individuals
People named in the underlying investigation.
E and F · Outside money
Large national spending and independent expenditure made for a candidate. Never the candidate’s own money, and never added to their receipts.

How the score is built

Roll calls on 2026 data center bills are tracked. A vote counts as protective when it sided with residents on cost, water, or local control.

Candidates with no legislative service have no score. That is shown as an absence, never as a zero.

Full roll calls and bill text: the legislative scorecard.

Correct the record

Every figure here traces to a state-published filing. If something is wrong, we want to fix it fast.

Candidates may submit a questionnaire response at any time; it is published verbatim beside the voting record.

Email corrections through the Elections page.